[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1D2C9396-01CB-4981-B493-EA311F0457E7@163.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 22:01:46 +0800
From: pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
xiakaixu <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hekuang@...wei.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/1] bpf: control events stored in PERF_EVENT_ARRAY maps trace data output when perf sampling
发自我的 iPhone
> 在 2015年10月21日,下午9:49,Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> 写道:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:42:12PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>> How can an eBPF program access a !local event:
>>
>> when creating perf event array we don't care which perf event
>> is for which CPU, so perf program can access any perf event in
>> that array.
>
> So what is stopping the eBPF thing from calling perf_event_read_local()
> on a !local event and triggering a kernel splat?
I can understand the perf_event_read_local() case, but I really can't understand
what is stopping us to write to an atomic field belong to a !local perf event.
Could you please give a further explanation?
Thank you.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists