[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022150137-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:30:46 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, carolyn.wyborny@...el.com,
donald.c.skidmore@...el.com, eddie.dong@...el.com,
nrupal.jani@...el.com, yang.z.zhang@...el.com, agraf@...e.de,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
emil.s.tantilov@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
john.ronciak@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, matthew.vick@...el.com,
mitch.a.williams@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
shannon.nelson@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 12/12] IXGBEVF: Track dma dirty pages
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:37:44AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> Migration relies on tracking dirty page to migrate memory.
> Hardware can't automatically mark a page as dirty after DMA
> memory access. VF descriptor rings and data buffers are modified
> by hardware when receive and transmit data. To track such dirty memory
> manually, do dummy writes(read a byte and write it back) during receive
> and transmit data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
> index d22160f..ce7bd7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
> @@ -414,6 +414,9 @@ static bool ixgbevf_clean_tx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
> if (!(eop_desc->wb.status & cpu_to_le32(IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD)))
> break;
>
> + /* write back status to mark page dirty */
Which page? the descriptor ring? What does marking it dirty accomplish
though, given that we might migrate right before this happens?
It might be a good idea to just specify addresses of rings
to hypervisor, and have it send the ring pages after VM
and the VF are stopped.
> + eop_desc->wb.status = eop_desc->wb.status;
> +
Compiler is likely to optimize this out.
You also probably need a wmb here ...
> /* clear next_to_watch to prevent false hangs */
> tx_buffer->next_to_watch = NULL;
> tx_buffer->desc_num = 0;
> @@ -946,15 +949,17 @@ static struct sk_buff *ixgbevf_fetch_rx_buffer(struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
> {
> struct ixgbevf_rx_buffer *rx_buffer;
> struct page *page;
> + u8 *page_addr;
>
> rx_buffer = &rx_ring->rx_buffer_info[rx_ring->next_to_clean];
> page = rx_buffer->page;
> prefetchw(page);
>
> - if (likely(!skb)) {
> - void *page_addr = page_address(page) +
> - rx_buffer->page_offset;
> + /* Mark page dirty */
Looks like there's a race condition here: VM could
migrate at this point. RX ring will indicate
packet has been received, but page data would be stale.
One solution I see is explicitly testing for this
condition and discarding the packet.
For example, hypervisor could increment some counter
in RAM during migration.
Then:
x = read counter
get packet from rx ring
mark page dirty
y = read counter
if (x != y)
discard packet
> + page_addr = page_address(page) + rx_buffer->page_offset;
> + *page_addr = *page_addr;
Compiler is likely to optimize this out.
You also probably need a wmb here ...
>
> + if (likely(!skb)) {
> /* prefetch first cache line of first page */
> prefetch(page_addr);
prefetch makes no sense if you read it right here.
> #if L1_CACHE_BYTES < 128
> @@ -1032,6 +1037,9 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
> if (!ixgbevf_test_staterr(rx_desc, IXGBE_RXD_STAT_DD))
> break;
>
> + /* Write back status to mark page dirty */
> + rx_desc->wb.upper.status_error = rx_desc->wb.upper.status_error;
> +
same question as for tx.
> /* This memory barrier is needed to keep us from reading
> * any other fields out of the rx_desc until we know the
> * RXD_STAT_DD bit is set
> --
> 1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists