[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5628DF61.6080102@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:06:41 -0700
From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rshearma@...cade.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] mpls: multipath route support
On 10/21/15, 7:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> writes:
>
>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> This patch adds support for MPLS multipath routes.
>>
>> Includes following changes to support multipath:
>> - splits struct mpls_route into 'struct mpls_route + struct mpls_nh'
>>
>> - 'struct mpls_nh' represents a mpls nexthop label forwarding entry
>>
>> - moves mpls route and nexthop structures into internal.h
>>
>> - A mpls_route can point to multiple mpls_nh structs
>>
>> - the nexthops are maintained as a array (similar to ipv4 fib)
>>
>> - In the process of restructuring, this patch also consistently changes
>> all labels to u8
>>
>> - Adds support to parse/fill RTA_MULTIPATH netlink attribute for
>> multipath routes similar to ipv4/v6 fib
>>
>> - In this patch, the multipath route nexthop selection algorithm
>> simply returns the first nexthop. It is replaced by a
>> hash based algorithm from Robert Shearman in the next patch
>>
>> - mpls_route_update cleanup: remove 'dev' handling in mpls_route_update.
>> mpls_route_update though implemented to update based on dev, it was
>> never used that way. And the dev handling gets tricky with multiple nexthops.
>> Cannot match against any single nexthops dev. So, this patch removes the unused
>> 'dev' handling in mpls_route_update.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> $ip -f mpls route add 100 nexthop as 200 via inet 10.1.1.2 dev swp1 \
>> nexthop as 700 via inet 10.1.1.6 dev swp2 \
>> nexthop as 800 via inet 40.1.1.2 dev swp3
>>
>> $ip -f mpls route show
>> 100
>> nexthop as to 200 via inet 10.1.1.2 dev swp1
>> nexthop as to 700 via inet 10.1.1.6 dev swp2
>> nexthop as to 800 via inet 40.1.1.2 dev swp3
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/mpls_iptunnel.h | 2 +-
>> net/mpls/af_mpls.c | 498 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> net/mpls/internal.h | 52 ++++-
>> 3 files changed, 403 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>> index bb185a2..ebefdd4 100644
>> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> [...]
>> @@ -431,15 +417,171 @@ static struct net_device *find_outdev(struct net *net,
>> return dev;
>> }
>>
>> +static int mpls_nh_assign_dev(struct net *net, struct mpls_nh *nh, int oif)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *dev = NULL;
>> + int err = -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + dev = find_outdev(net, nh, oif);
>> + if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
>> + err = PTR_ERR(dev);
>> + dev = NULL;
>> + goto errout;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Ensure this is a supported device */
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + if (!mpls_dev_get(dev))
>> + goto errout;
>> +
>> + /* For now just support ethernet devices */
>> + if ((dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER) && (dev->type != ARPHRD_LOOPBACK))
>> + goto errout;
> Roopa you don't need this extra test of ARPHRD_ETHER and ARPHRD_LOOPBACK.
> We already guard mpls_add_dev with this, so mpls_dev_get will fail if it
> is the wrong kind of device.
>
Ack, will respin. thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists