[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5628E62A.8090607@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:35:38 -0700
From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rshearma@...cade.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] mpls: multipath support
On 10/21/15, 9:04 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> writes:
>
>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> This patch adds support for MPLS multipath routes.
>>
>> Includes following changes to support multipath:
>> - splits struct mpls_route into 'struct mpls_route + struct mpls_nh'.
>>
>> - struct mpls_nh represents a mpls nexthop label forwarding entry
>>
>> - Adds support to parse/fill RTA_MULTIPATH netlink attribute for
>> multipath routes similar to ipv4/v6 fib
>>
>> - In the process of restructuring, this patch also consistently changes all
>> labels to u8
>>
>> $ip -f mpls route add 100 nexthop as 200 via inet 10.1.1.2 dev swp1 \
>> nexthop as 700 via inet 10.1.1.6 dev swp2 \
>> nexthop as 800 via inet 40.1.1.2 dev swp3
>>
>> $ip -f mpls route show
>> 100
>> nexthop as to 200 via inet 10.1.1.2 dev swp1
>> nexthop as to 700 via inet 10.1.1.6 dev swp2
>> nexthop as to 800 via inet 40.1.1.2 dev swp3
>>
>> Roopa Prabhu (1):
>> mpls: multipath support
>>
>> Robert Shearman (1):
>> mpls: flow-based multipath selection
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> ----
>> v2:
>> - Incorporate some feedback from Robert:
>> use dynamic allocation (list) instead of static allocation
>> for nexthops
>> v3:
>> - Move back to arrays (same as v1), also suggested by Eric Biederman
>>
>> v4:
>> - address a few comments from Eric Biederman
>> Plan to address the following pending comments in incremental patches after this
>> infrastructure changes go in.
>> - Move VIA size to 16 bytes
>> - use ipv6 flow label in ecmp calculations
>> - dead route handling during multipath route selection (I had planned this in
>> an incremental patch initially).
> I don't see anything problematic in the patches the worst
> I found is dead code and we can delete that later so
> for purposes of moving forward I say:
>
> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>
> That said we really need dead path handling. Without handling paths
> that go dead this functionality really is pretty much broken. So if you
> can't get that by the merge window we will need to apply a patch to
> disable processing of the RTA_MULTIPATH netlink attribute.
I will submit these before the merge window. Since dead routes were not handled for the non-multipath routes, it always was an incremental feature to cover on my TODO list. Understand your concern, I will submit them soon.
thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists