[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022170100.1e45a8b8@griffin>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:00:59 +0200
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
thaller@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: try harder to not reuse ifindex when moving
interfaces
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:52:13 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> With the proposed scenario:
> 1. create netns 'new_netns'
> 2. in root netns, move the interface with ifindex 2 to new_netns
> 3. in new_netns, delete the interface with ifindex 2
> 4. in new_netns, create an interface - it will get ifindex 2
>
> Operation 2 and 4 are done by dev_change_net_namespace() under rtnl_lock().
> RTM_DELLINK(root netns) and RTM_NEWLINK(new_netns) are sent by this function.
> It means that operation 3 has been done before and that RTM_DELLINK(new_netns)
> has been sent before.
Imagine the application trying to configure the interface with ifindex 2
after your step 2. It constructs a netlink message and sends it to the
kernel; but while doing so, steps 3 and 4 happen. Now the application
ends up configuring a different interface than it intended to. After
that, it polls the netlink socket and receives the notifications about
interface disappearing and a new one appearing.
I don't see any way the user space application can prevent this. There
will always be a race between receiving netlink notifications and
sending config requests.
I guess Thomas Haller can elaborate more as he ran into this.
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists