[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5628FF7A.5040807@6wind.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:23:38 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
thaller@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: try harder to not reuse ifindex when moving
interfaces
Le 22/10/2015 17:00, Jiri Benc a écrit :
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:52:13 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> With the proposed scenario:
>> 1. create netns 'new_netns'
>> 2. in root netns, move the interface with ifindex 2 to new_netns
>> 3. in new_netns, delete the interface with ifindex 2
>> 4. in new_netns, create an interface - it will get ifindex 2
>>
>> Operation 2 and 4 are done by dev_change_net_namespace() under rtnl_lock().
>> RTM_DELLINK(root netns) and RTM_NEWLINK(new_netns) are sent by this function.
>> It means that operation 3 has been done before and that RTM_DELLINK(new_netns)
>> has been sent before.
>
> Imagine the application trying to configure the interface with ifindex 2
> after your step 2. It constructs a netlink message and sends it to the
> kernel; but while doing so, steps 3 and 4 happen. Now the application
> ends up configuring a different interface than it intended to. After
> that, it polls the netlink socket and receives the notifications about
> interface disappearing and a new one appearing.
Understood.
>
> I don't see any way the user space application can prevent this. There
> will always be a race between receiving netlink notifications and
> sending config requests.
Yeah, I'm also starting to think that reducing this window is the way to go.
Thank you,
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists