[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMhgzfbGf-3Z7GJGxg5VqbWGyKqoTt6c4C54sDNehdXVMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:58:58 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> (mst@...hat.com)"
<mst@...hat.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
carolyn.wyborny@...el.com,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
eddie.dong@...el.com, nrupal.jani@...el.com,
yang.z.zhang@...el.com, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, emil.s.tantilov@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
john.ronciak@...el.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, matthew.vick@...el.com,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 00/12] IXGBE: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Alex Williamson
<alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
> This is why the typical VF agnostic approach here is to using bonding
> and fail over to a emulated device during migration, so performance
> suffers, but downtime is something acceptable.
bonding in the VM isn't a zero touch solution, right? is it really acceptable?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists