[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022184852.GP18351@esperanza>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:48:53 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: vmscan: report vmpressure at the level of
reclaim activity
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:21:35AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
...
> @@ -2437,6 +2439,10 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> }
> }
>
> + vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg,
> + sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
> + sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
> +
> /*
> * Direct reclaim and kswapd have to scan all memory
> * cgroups to fulfill the overall scan target for the
> @@ -2454,10 +2460,6 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> }
> } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, &reclaim)));
>
> - vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
> - sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
> - sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
> -
> if (sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed)
> reclaimable = true;
>
I may be mistaken, but AFAIU this patch subtly changes the behavior of
vmpressure visible from the userspace: w/o this patch a userspace
process will only receive a notification for a memory cgroup only if
*this* memory cgroup calls reclaimer; with this patch userspace
notification will be issued even if reclaimer is invoked by any cgroup
up the hierarchy.
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists