[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151021.182955.1434243485706993231.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Cc: Alan.Burlison@...cle.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dholland-tech@...bsd.org, casper.dik@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect
for sockets in accept(3)
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:51:04 +0100
> Sure, but the upkeep of data structures it would need is there
> whether you actually end up triggering it or not. Both in
> memory footprint and in cacheline pingpong...
+1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists