netdev - Re: CONFIG_XPS depends on L1_CACHE_BYTES being greater than sizeof(struct xps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1445636317.22974.188.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:38:37 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc:	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_XPS depends on L1_CACHE_BYTES being greater than
 sizeof(struct xps_map)

On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 23:08 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:

> Can you then maybe give me an Acked-by or signed-off for the patch below?
> It further adds a compile-time check to avoid that XPS_MIN_MAP_ALLOC
> gets calculated to zero on any architecture - otherwise no queues would
> be allocated. 
> 
> In addition I would like to push it for v4.3 then through my parisc-tree
> (after keeping it in for-next for 1-2 days), together with the patch
> which reduces L1_CACHE_BYTES to 16 on parisc.
> Would that be OK too? 

Sure !

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html