[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151023084609.585AEA0C18@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:46:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH stable<3.19] net: handle null iovec pointer in
skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec()
Mainline commit 89c22d8c3b27 ("net: Fix skb csum races when peeking")
backport into pre-3.19 stable kernels introduces a regression causing
null pointer dererefence in skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec().
This commit only sets CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for non-shared skb, allowing
udp_recvmsg() to take the "else" branch of if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb))
when called with null iovec (and len=0, e.g. when peeking for datagram
size first). The problem is that unlike skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_msg()
called in this path since 3.19, skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() does
not handle null iov parameter and always dereferences iov->iov_len. This
is especially harmful when udp_recvmsg() is called in kernel context,
e.g. from kernel nfsd.
Band-aid skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() by testing iov for null and
only checking the checksum in this case.
Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
---
net/core/datagram.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c
index 3a402a7b20e9..f8b38794fa9b 100644
--- a/net/core/datagram.c
+++ b/net/core/datagram.c
@@ -799,6 +799,13 @@ int skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (!chunk)
return 0;
+ if (!iov) {
+ if (__skb_checksum_complete(skb))
+ goto csum_error;
+ else
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/* Skip filled elements.
* Pretty silly, look at memcpy_toiovec, though 8)
*/
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists