[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1445892312.1018239.420827817.3EC76081@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:45:12 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: recreate ipv6 link-local addresses when
increasing MTU over IPV6_MIN_MTU
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 20:16, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
>
> >Hello Alex,
> >
> >On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 16:52, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> Seems like this code isn't quite correct. You are calling ipv6_add_dev
> >> for slave devices, and if I understand things correctly I don't believe
> >> that was happening before and may be an unintended side effect.
> >
> >Ah, btw., autoconf and ipv6 operation on IFF_SLAVE devices is actually
> >desired nowadays and don't think we can change this. See also:
> ><https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/531196/>
>
> IPv6 addrconf on IFF_SLAVE devices was disabled for bonding
> slaves in commit c2edacf80e15 because it caused issues with snooping
> switches.
>
> This is also referenced in
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236750
>
> Won't re-enabling autoconf on IFF_SLAVE devices cause that issue
> to return?
Both patches don't enable autoconf on IFF_SLAVE devices. Sorry for being
imprecise. The referred patch was changing the behavior to whether the
device had a master device.
@Alex, I will take your patch and submit it with the necessary guards to
not enable ipv6 again if we forcefully disable ipv6 and later on shrink
and increase the MTU again. I will do so in your name. Thanks again for
the patch!
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists