netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-net: Using single MSIX IRQ for TX/RX Q pair

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <562FF704.1050608@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:13:24 -0700
From:	Ravi Kerur <rkerur@...il.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	mst@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-net: Using single MSIX IRQ for TX/RX Q
 pair



On 10/26/2015 10:11 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/27/2015 01:52 AM, Ravi Kerur wrote:
>> Ported earlier patch from Jason Wang (dated 12/26/2014).
>>
>> This patch tries to reduce the number of MSIX irqs required for
>> virtio-net by sharing a MSIX irq for each TX/RX queue pair through
>> channels. If transport support channel, about half of the MSIX irqs
>> were reduced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kerur <rkerur@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Thanks for the patches. Some minor comments:
> 
> - If there's no big changes of the code, better keep my sign-offs :)

Sorry for that. Will fix it in 'v2'

> - Rusty does not like the name "channels", so better rename it to
> "virtqueue groups"
> - Build bot reports some compiling issues, this need to be fixed in next
> version.

I saw build failure email, it was reported against 2nd patch. All 3 patches need to be applied for successful build. Will look into it and fix any issues.

> - The order of patches in this series is reversed, pach 1/3 should be
> 3/3. And better to have a cover letter to describe the motivation and
> changes since last series. (You can do this through git format-patch
> --cover)
> - Michale's comment about unnecessary wakeup of tx queue needs to be
> addressed, otherwise, we may get unnecessary tx interrupts.

I am working on it, will take care of above comments as well in 'v2'

> - Some benchmarks is needed to make sure there's no performance regression.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index d8838ded..d705cce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ struct send_queue {
>>  
>>  	/* Name of the send queue: output.$index */
>>  	char name[40];
>> +
>> +	/* Name of the channel, shared with irq. */
>> +	char channel_name[40];
>>  };
>>  
>>  /* Internal representation of a receive virtqueue */
>> @@ -1529,6 +1532,8 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>  	int ret = -ENOMEM;
>>  	int i, total_vqs;
>>  	const char **names;
>> +	const char **channel_names;
>> +	unsigned *channels;
>>  
>>  	/* We expect 1 RX virtqueue followed by 1 TX virtqueue, followed by
>>  	 * possible N-1 RX/TX queue pairs used in multiqueue mode, followed by
>> @@ -1548,6 +1553,17 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>  	if (!names)
>>  		goto err_names;
>>  
>> +	channel_names = kmalloc_array(vi->max_queue_pairs,
>> +				      sizeof(*channel_names),
>> +				      GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!channel_names)
>> +		goto err_channel_names;
>> +
>> +	channels = kmalloc_array(total_vqs, sizeof(*channels),
>> +				 GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!channels)
>> +		goto err_channels;
>> +
>>  	/* Parameters for control virtqueue, if any */
>>  	if (vi->has_cvq) {
>>  		callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = NULL;
>> @@ -1562,10 +1578,15 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>  		sprintf(vi->sq[i].name, "output.%d", i);
>>  		names[rxq2vq(i)] = vi->rq[i].name;
>>  		names[txq2vq(i)] = vi->sq[i].name;
>> +		sprintf(vi->sq[i].channel_name, "txrx.%d", i);
>> +		channel_names[i] = vi->sq[i].channel_name;
>> +		channels[rxq2vq(i)] = i;
>> +		channels[txq2vq(i)] = i;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	ret = vi->vdev->config->find_vqs(vi->vdev, total_vqs, vqs, callbacks,
>> -					 names);
>> +					 names, channels, channel_names,
>> +					 vi->max_queue_pairs);
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		goto err_find;
>>  
>> @@ -1580,6 +1601,8 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>  		vi->sq[i].vq = vqs[txq2vq(i)];
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	kfree(channels);
>> +	kfree(channel_names);
>>  	kfree(names);
>>  	kfree(callbacks);
>>  	kfree(vqs);
>> @@ -1587,6 +1610,10 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>  	return 0;
>>  
>>  err_find:
>> +	kfree(channels);
>> +err_channels:
>> +	kfree(channel_names);
>> +err_channel_names:
>>  	kfree(names);
>>  err_names:
>>  	kfree(callbacks);
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html