[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALx6S35udd410V5bEzH2OxE=Qug0fydo10-X6E__gwzeGYCtzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:22:55 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] ipv4: no CHECKSUM_PARTIAL on MSG_MORE
corked sockets
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
> We cannot reliable calculate packet size on MSG_MORE corked sockets
> and thus cannot decide if they are going to be fragmented later on,
> so better not use CHECKSUM_PARTIAL in the first place.
>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
> Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> ---
> net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> index 50e2973..0b02417 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> @@ -911,6 +911,7 @@ static int __ip_append_data(struct sock *sk,
> if (transhdrlen &&
> length + fragheaderlen <= mtu &&
> rt->dst.dev->features & NETIF_F_V4_CSUM &&
> + !(flags & MSG_MORE) &&
I still don't understand this. It seems like the effect is to disable
checksum offload for all UDP messages sent with MSG_MORE flag set.
> !exthdrlen)
> csummode = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
>
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists