[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <562F1577.8040803@electromag.com.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:11:03 +0800
From: Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com
Subject: stmmac: Reporting ethtool_ts_info
G'day All,
The stmmac driver checks (priv->hwts_tx_en) && (priv->hwts_rx_en) before
reporting WHTSTAMP capabilities.
No other driver seems to do this. hwts_*_en indicate if timestamping is
enabled, not if the interface is capable of it.
Instead they check there capabilities. Which would be
(priv->dma_cap.time_stamp || priv->dma_cap.atime_stamp)
Does this seem reasonable?
--
Regards
Phil Reid
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists