[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446249142.6254.47.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:52:22 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] tcp: attach SYNACK messages to request sockets instead
of listener
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 21:42 +0000, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
>
>
> With your 2nd patch, I saw:
> [ 19.242104] Wow ! headroom=164 while hh_len(eth0)=240
>
> After adding the 3rd patch with increased LL_MAX_HEADER,
> the warning and stack trace no longer show up.
>
> Also, could you fix the net core code so that it doesn't
> panic even with reallocated header?
Well, the reason we have a net-next tree, is that we can let
new features settling for a while, and eventually detect and fix
old bugs.
In your case, having the proper LL_MAX_HEADER will likely improve
performance of TCP_RR like workloads by a nice number :
Re-allocating/copying all TCP packets without notice was _not_ a nice
feature.
Panicing while in net-next mode certainly is something a developer will
notice and report.
BTW, it is possible we have to revert the SYNACK attachment to request
sockets, if it turns out we have too many bugs to fix.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists