[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151031215116.GO22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:51:16 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect
for sockets in accept(3)
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:23:31PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The other stuff we probably can't do all that much about. Unless we
> decide to go for some complicated lockless optimistic file descriptor
> allocation scheme with retry-on-failure instead of locks. Which I'm
> sure is possible, but I'm equally sure is painful.
The interesting part is dup2() - we'd have to do something like
serialize against other dup2
was_claimed = atomically set and test bit in bitmap
if was_claimed
tofree = fdt->fd[fd];
if (!tofree)
fail with EBUSY
install into ->fd[...]
end of critical area
in there; __alloc_fd() could be made retry-on-failure, but I don't see
how to cope with dup2 vs. dup2 without an explicit exclusion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists