[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7MogROyXLDhT7FrVLiLRhJueB0DmKGVDr49xDxcT2Q2KA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:50:40 -0800
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 2/4] net_sched: update hierarchical backlog too
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Well, before your changes, the qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen(sch, 0) would
> have been useless, since qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen() does nothing in this
> case [1]
>
> But after your changes, we need to change the backlog, even if the qlen
> does not change.
>
> Maybe I missed something, but your patch is not really obvious ;)
>
Oh, very good point... You actually mean in some cases we enqueue
one packet and then drop one packet which ends up with dropping 0
packet but the backlog size goes down by (drop_len - enqueue_len). :)
Hmm, I need to double check for this case for sure, but for sfq case,
I just did:
- qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen(sch, 1);
+ qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog(sch, 1, dropped);
which isn't the case where n==0, like you mentioned.
I am auditing that case for all the qdisc's anyway.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists