[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446448990.2437.7.camel@spectralink.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 07:23:12 +0000
From: Sørensen, Stefan
<Stefan.Sorensen@...ctralink.com>
To: "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] dp83640: Delay scheduled work.
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 21:37 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
>
> NAK. We want to have the time stamp ASAP, because the delay between
> the transmission of the Sync and its application in the servo
> degrades or even spoils synchronization. Think of an ARM SoC with
> HZ=100. Two jiffies are 20 milliseconds.
The workqueue is only used for delivering packets where the timestamp
was lost - if a timestamp is received, the packet is delivered
immediately. This patch may introduce a slight delay of the packets
where the timestamp never arrives, by these packets are properly not
very useful to the application anyway.
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists