netdev - Re: [PATCH] bpf: convert hashtab lock to raw lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151102122405.56dd97a1@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:24:05 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	"Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
Cc:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
	ast@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: convert hashtab lock to raw lock

On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:12:29 -0800
"Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org> wrote:

> Yes, it is common practice for converting sleepable spin lock to raw 
> spin lock in -rt to avoid scheduling in atomic context bug.

Note, in a lot of cases we don't just convert spin_locks to raw because
of atomic context. There's times we need to change the design where the
lock is not taken in atomic context (switching preempt_disable() to a
local_lock() for example).

But bpf is much like ftrace and kprobes where they can be taken almost
anywhere, and the do indeed need to be raw.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html