[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C98935CD-7723-4903-A4E2-DEB98DCC5912@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:45:39 -0800
From: Gilberto Bertin <gilberto.bertin@...il.com>
To: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Any-IP IPv6 support broken
> On 29 Oct 2015, at 17:44, Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com> wrote:
>
> What are you trying to do?
I would like to have a "bind-to-subnet" semantic with IPv6.
This is currently working with IPv4, and the setup is the follow:
- setup a dummy network device configured with any-IP
- add an any-IP route
- bind() on the dummy device
in this way we can effectively bind a process to a particular subnet
(by binding it to a dummy device which is receiving all the packets
from a particular subnet).
The point of using dummy devices is that we can configure multiple ones
(and so we can bind multiple processes to multiple subnets).
>
> Does what you're trying to do work on an older kernel? Which kernel
> version does it break at?
>
> btw. afaik any-ip doesn't work with IPv4 on any un-patched kernel (the
> IPv4 support patch was reverted).
This is actually working with IPv4 (as I said I'm using a recent kernel,
4.1), and the fact that you say it's not supposed to work leads me to
think that maybe we are not talking about the same feature.
Cheers,
gilberto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists