[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151103.103319.1465681990237533576.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:33:19 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kys@...rosoft.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: increase LL_MAX_HEADER if HYPERV_NET is
enabled
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 07:59:36 +0000
> I have implemented the scheme we had discussed a few weeks ago. In
> this new implementation our driver is NOT requesting addition
> headroom - rndis header and the per packet state is being maintained
> outside of the skb. What I am seeing is that when I have
> LL_MAX_HEADER set to 220 bytes, even though our driver is not using
> the additional head room, I see about a 10% boost in the peak
> performance (about 34 Gbps on a 40Gbps interface). However, when I
> set the LL_MAX_HEADER value to the current default, the peak
> performance drops back to what we currently have (around 31
> Gbps). In both these cases, there is no reallocation of skb since no
> additional headroom is being requested and yet there is a
> significant difference in performance. I trying to figure out why
> this is the case, your insights will be greatly appreciated.
It probably has something to do with cache line or data alignment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists