netdev - Re: [RFC][PATCH] net: arinc429: Add ARINC-429 stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAP7uc+z==A=VZqYXmsQB4CAuTXvbwefhVyUdud0ES30rbaBsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:18:16 +0100
From:	Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@...ksander.es>
To:	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Vostrikov Andrey <andrey.vostrikov@...entembedded.com>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] net: arinc429: Add ARINC-429 stack

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
>> , or the duplex TX/RX setup for channels
>> (channels are either RX or TX, not both), or the local
>> echoing/loopback (which wouldn't make much sense for TX-only
>> channels).
>
> Aren't the RX-only/TX-only channels rather a special case ?

They're actually the only case AFAIK. You've got systems generating
streams of ARINC429 words (e.g. the IRS, the FMC...) and systems that
may consume the streams from multiple independent channels (e.g. the
IFE). I try to think of each logical bus as a single transmitter
broadcasting to multiple receivers.

-- 
Aleksander
https://aleksander.es
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html