lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:41:09 +0100
From:	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:	Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@...ksander.es>,
	"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Vostrikov Andrey <andrey.vostrikov@...entembedded.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] net: arinc429: Add ARINC-429 stack

On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 at 06:32:12 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:

[...]

> It looks like you need to shift the stuff in user space every time.
> 
> So you might better think of something like this:
> 
>     struct a429_frame {
>             __u32   label;   /* ARINC 429 label */
>             __u8    length;  /* always set to 8 */
>             __u8    __pad;   /* padding */
>             __u8    __res0;  /* reserved / padding */
>             __u8    __res1;  /* reserved / padding */
>             __u32   data __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>             __u8    p;       /* p */
>             __u8    ssm;     /* ssm */
>             __u8    sdi;     /* sdi */
>             __u8    __end;   /* padding */
>     };

You don't want to interpret those P(arity)/SSM/SDI bits, since they differ
depending on whatever the remote party sends. That's why I decided to just
make those into 3-bytes of data and let the userland application deal with
it as seen fit. Besides, the ARINC "FTP" really uses those 3 bytes as plain
data.

> Good thing would be that you can directly see the content in logfiles and
> you can easily modify the content on the fly by can-gw.
> 
> Of course the arinc netdevice driver would have to take care to do the
> correct rx/tx whatever. But routing and processing arinc content through
> the CAN stack does not seem to be a bad idea IMO.

Pretty much, yeah.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ