lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7OvQ0-=w+uSUZmYUi4t4gfBgW+iLGEX5zsRr8-r_6pGGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:30:20 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: clean up dev_snmp6 proc entry when we fail to
 initialize inet6_dev

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net> wrote:
> In ipv6_add_dev, when addrconf_sysctl_register fails, we do not clean up
> the dev_snmp6 entry that we have already registered for this device.
>
> It is safe to call snmp6_unregister_dev unconditionally from
> in6_dev_finish_destroy, so do it.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> ---
> Dmitry, I'm not completely sure it's the issue you're triggering, but
> it sems likely.
>
>  net/ipv6/addrconf_core.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf_core.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf_core.c
> index bfa941fc1165..96248a333197 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf_core.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf_core.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ void in6_dev_finish_destroy(struct inet6_dev *idev)
>                 pr_warn("Freeing alive inet6 device %p\n", idev);
>                 return;
>         }
> +
> +       snmp6_unregister_dev(idev);
>         call_rcu(&idev->rcu, in6_dev_finish_destroy_rcu);


Hmm, but looks like we can't call a function from ipv6 module in a core file?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ