netdev - Re: [PATCH] sh_eth: merge sh_eth_free_dma_buffer() into sh_eth_ring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <563B5144.8050800@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:53:24 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh_eth: merge sh_eth_free_dma_buffer() into
 sh_eth_ring_free()

Hello.

On 11/5/2015 4:59 AM, David Miller wrote:

>> While the ring allocation is done by a single function, sh_eth_ring_init(),
>> the ring deallocation was split into two functions (almost always called
>> one after the other) for no good reason. Merge  sh_eth_free_dma_buffer()
>> into sh_eth_ring_free() which allows us  to save space not only on the
>> direct calls  of the former function but also on the sh_eth_ring_init()'s
>> simplified error path...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
>
> Applied.

    Hum, I'm seeing both patches in the net.git repo, while they were  clearly 
targeted to net-next.git... Did you really consider these 2 patches fixes?

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html