[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <563B8F95.9000507@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 20:19:17 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh_eth: merge sh_eth_free_dma_buffer() into
sh_eth_ring_free()
Hello.
On 11/05/2015 07:13 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>>> While the ring allocation is done by a single function,
>>>> sh_eth_ring_init(),
>>>> the ring deallocation was split into two functions (almost always
>>>> called
>>>> one after the other) for no good reason. Merge
>>>> sh_eth_free_dma_buffer()
>>>> into sh_eth_ring_free() which allows us to save space not only on the
>>>> direct calls of the former function but also on the
>>>> sh_eth_ring_init()'s
>>>> simplified error path...
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
>>>
>>> Applied.
>>
>> Hum, I'm seeing both patches in the net.git repo, while they were
>> clearly targeted to net-next.git... Did you really consider these 2
>> patches fixes?
>
> It was more work for me to let the patches rot in patchwork until I openned
> net-next back up than to simply just apply them to net.
OK, thank you!
> You guys really make an enormous amount of work and stress for me when you
> submit net-next patches when I _CLEARLY_ and _EXPLICITLY_ state that the
> tree is closed right now.
Hmm, I hadn't seen your announcement, else I would have refrained from
sending. Will look for it now...
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists