[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1446911439-9235-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 00:50:39 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: [PATCH] tcp: use kmalloc() than kmalloc_array().
Commit 095dc8e0c3686d58 ("tcp: fix/cleanup inet_ehash_locks_alloc()")
silently changed from kmalloc() to kmalloc_array(). The latter has
overflow check whereas the former doesn't have.
If nblocks * locksz might overflow, we need to do like
- if (!hashinfo->ehash_locks && nblocks > SIZE_MAX / locksz)
+ if (!hashinfo->ehash_locks && nblocks > SIZE_MAX / locksz)
hashinfo->ehash_locks = vmalloc(nblocks * locksz);
because kmalloc_array() detects overflow and returns NULL.
But if nblocks * locksz is guaranteed not to overflow, there is
no need to use kmalloc_array().
Since I assume it won't overflow, use kmalloc() than kmalloc_array().
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index ccc5980..8f4ab27 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -648,8 +648,8 @@ int inet_ehash_locks_alloc(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo)
/* no more locks than number of hash buckets */
nblocks = min(nblocks, hashinfo->ehash_mask + 1);
- hashinfo->ehash_locks = kmalloc_array(nblocks, locksz,
- GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ hashinfo->ehash_locks = kmalloc(nblocks * locksz,
+ GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (!hashinfo->ehash_locks)
hashinfo->ehash_locks = vmalloc(nblocks * locksz);
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists