[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511071920450.1976@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 19:21:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...el.com,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, rshearma@...cade.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] decnet: remove macro-local declarations
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:57:34 +0100 (CET)
>
> >> > Would it be preferable to remove the macro entirely and inline the for
> >> > loop header?
> >>
> >> Could you show me an example of how this would look exactly?
> >
> > One possible solution is below. I moved the initialization of the nh
> > pointer inside the loop to reduce the size of the loop header. One could
> > also inline fi->fib_nh[nhsel] where it occurs, but it seemed that that
> > would make quite long expressions.
>
> Personally I like the explicit named iterator. It is descriptive and
> tells that we are walking over all of the nexthops for a route.
OK, I'll follow that solution.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists