[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:47:55 +0000
From: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: romieu@...zoreil.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, slash.tmp@...e.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] net: ethernet: add driver for Aurora VLSI NB8800 Ethernet controller
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:35:05 +0000
>
>>> I don't think it's silly at all.
>>
>> I'm sure I read somewhere that the time spent spinning on a lock should
>> be kept as small as possible.
>>
>>> And unless you can measure it making a difference, don't knock the idea.
>>
>> I tried using netif_tx_lock() in the IRQ handler instead, and it locked
>> up solid. Clearly that was the wrong thing to do.
>
> Oh that's right, it's a BH lock not an IRQ one.
>
> Yet another argument for doing everything in ->poll(), thus making all
> operations outside of NAPI scheduling run in software interrupt
> context, and therefore being able to make use of the TXQ lock for
> this.
Well, I tried calling the DMA restart function from NAPI poll under
netif_tx_lock(). Now it works only as long as there is incoming
traffic.
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@...sr.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists