[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151113184947.09d57da5@vostro>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:49:47 +0200
From: Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: via-velocity skb_over_panic
Hi,
I recently saw via-velocity skb_over_panic() on one of my locations.
The panic happened with two separate hardware devices, so it appears to
be network related, not broken hardware.
I did not get the actual over_panic printk, as I got only screen shot
of them monitor. But the visible part of call trace says:
<IRQ>
skb_put
velocity_poll
net_rx_action
__do_softirq
irq_exit
common_interrupt
<EOI>
The was recurring every few hours, so I patched via-velocity with the
following after looking the code a bit:
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c
@@ -2060,6 +2060,11 @@ static int velocity_receive_frame(struct velocity_info *vptr, int idx)
stats->rx_length_errors++;
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (pkt_len < 4 || pkt_len > vptr->rx.buf_sz) {
+ VELOCITY_PRT(MSG_LEVEL_VERBOSE, KERN_ERR " %s : the received frame size %d is inconsistent.\n", vptr->netdev->name, pkt_len);
+ stats->rx_length_errors++;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
if (rd->rdesc0.RSR & RSR_MAR)
stats->multicast++;
This seems to have fixed the panics. And I do see one of the NIC's
ethtool report's in_range_length_errors increasing once in a while. For
some reason I don't see the above debug message though, so I'm not sure
on what pkt_len triggers it.
In any case, the cade a bit later on does unconditionally:
skb_put(skb, pkt_len - 4);
So it's possible that some bad packets make the NIC return unexpected
packet sizes, and the current code can panic on it.
Any suggestions for better fix?
Thanks,
Timo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists