netdev - Re: irq_fpu_usable() is false in ndo_start

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHmME9paDGfgf7NxYsC-MmBWdLeK+Uj2OV5X8FNxUoABObuXuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:37:45 +0100
From:	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: irq_fpu_usable() is false in ndo_start_xmit() for UDP packets

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:33 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> Someone already did a Linux implemenation of exactly that two decades
> ago, we rejected that design and did what we did.

It's not exactly IPSec though, so don't worry. It's a totally new
thing that combines a lot of different recent ideas, in the virtual
networking arena as well as in crypto. *It's going to be cool.* And
I'm determined to please you with the design and implementation in the
end. So let me finish off my first implementation, and then we can do
some back and forth on the overall high level ideas and iron out some
of the potential implementation issues that you find. I'll incorporate
your feedback iteratively until it's in a state that you like. I've
been working on this day and night for months, and I'm *almost* there.
Bare with me a little longer, and expect a nice "[RFC]" email to be
sent your way soon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html