netdev - Re: Routing loops & TTL tracking with tunnel devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:28:52 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>,
	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>, therbert@...gle.com,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Routing loops & TTL tracking with tunnel devices

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 21:55 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Sowmini,
> 
> Neat. Though, in my case, I'm not actually just prepending a header.
> I'm doing some more substantial transformations of a packet. And this
> needs to work with v4 too. So I'm not sure implementing a v6 spec will
> help with things. I need to identify the right mechanism inside the
> kernel to assist with this, like, say, a member in sk_buff.

There is very little chance we'll accept a new member in sk_buff, unless
proven needed.

Yes, it is very tempting and dozen of programmers already tried.

You'll have to demonstrate full understanding of the stack and why other
solutions do not work.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html