[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151118173234.GB5860@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:32:34 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
marcelo.leitner@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] net: tcp: move to timewait when receiving data
post active-close
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 16:54 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>
> > Still, the RST packet can be dropped along the way. So the teardown of
> > the socket on the other side might not happen.
>
> This is why it is better to send RST for every incoming in-excess packet
I'm convinced and marked patch as rejected in patchwork.
Thanks Eric!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists