[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151119195419.GA6728@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:54:20 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: remove useless check in napi_gro_frags()
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:42:50AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Checking if skb is NULL in napi_gro_frags() is too late.
>
> If skb was NULL, we would crash earlier in napi_frags_skb()
>
> Drivers normally catch napi_get_frags() NULL return value
> before calling napi_gro_frags()
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 41cef3e3f558b857a9093a83f6b0c73f32b8b45f..8d8d34ff68f5800dbcb2958b6a937b9db478e359 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -4465,9 +4465,6 @@ gro_result_t napi_gro_frags(struct napi_struct *napi)
> {
> struct sk_buff *skb = napi_frags_skb(napi);
>
> - if (!skb)
> - return GRO_DROP;
> -
I don't get it. napi_frags_skb() can return valid NULL.
Should it be fixed there as well?
Must be missing something...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists