[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151119135023.GH8494@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:50:24 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] mm: memcontrol: account socket memory in unified
hierarchy memory controller
On Wed 18-11-15 16:48:22, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> So I ran perf record -g -a netperf -t TCP_STREAM multiple times inside
> a memory-controlled cgroup, but mostly mem_cgroup_charge_skmem() does
> not show up in the profile at all. Once it was there with 0.00%.
OK, this sounds very good! This means that most workloads which are not
focusing solely on the network traffic shouldn't even notice. I can
imagine that workloads with high throughput demands would notice but I
would also expect them to disable the feature.
Could you add this information to the changelog, please?
> I ran another test that downloads the latest kernel image from
> kernel.org at 13MB/s (on my i5 laptop) and it looks like this:
>
> 0.02% 0.01% irq/44-iwlwifi [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mem_cgroup_charge_skmem
> |
> ---mem_cgroup_charge_skmem
> __sk_mem_schedule
> tcp_try_rmem_schedule
> tcp_data_queue
> tcp_rcv_established
> tcp_v4_do_rcv
> tcp_v4_rcv
> ip_local_deliver
> ip_rcv
> __netif_receive_skb_core
> __netif_receive_skb
> netif_receive_skb_internal
> napi_gro_complete
>
> The runs vary too much for this to be measurable in elapsed time.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists