lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:42:34 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	tom@...bertland.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] net: The beginning of the end for
 NETIF_F_IP_CSUM and NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM

From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:55:46 -0800

> Goals of this patch set:
> 
> We propose that drivers advertise NETIF_F_HW_CSUM instead of protocol
> specific values of NETIF_F_IP_CSUM and NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM.  If the
> driver's device is constrained (for instance it can only offlaod simple
> IPv4 and IPv6 packets) then these constraints can be checked in the
> transmit path and skb_checksum_help would be called for packets that the
> driver is unable to offload. In order to facilitate this, we add some
> helper functions that takes a specification argument indicating the
> type of packets a device is able to offload. If a packet does not match
> the specification, the helper function calls skb_checksum_help.

I very much like the direction this is taking things.  And I do sincerely
hope that this does in fact actually encourage HW vendors to drop all of
the protocol specific offloading, and just support 2's complement sums.

They can turn that _trivially_ into whatever the Windows et al. driver
interfaces want in their respective drivers.

There is absolutely no reason to implement protocol specific checksum
offloads in silicon in this day and age.

Absolutely none.

So driver folks tell your hardware buddies to just stop doing it now
and get with the program.  Even your marketing department shouldn't
care, they can list support for every protocol on the planet in their
specs and packaging if they want, and it might even look impressive...

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ