[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56536A62.4040103@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:34:58 -0800
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To: Z Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: daniel@...earbox.net, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: bpf: add 'store immediate' instruction
Hi folks,
Any more comments on this patch (store immediate only)?
I need more time to add XADD (I'm supposed everyone agrees it is
equivalent to atomic_add). However, this one is irrelevant to XADD, so
we may be able to apply it first?
Thanks,
Yang
On 11/12/2015 7:45 PM, Z Lim wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Shi, Yang <yang.shi@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 11/11/2015 4:39 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>
>>> Wait a second, we're both talking rubbish here :) The STR (immediate)
>>> form is referring to the addressing mode, whereas this patch wants to
>>> store an immediate value to memory, which does need moving to a register
>>> first.
>>
>>
>> Yes, the immediate means immediate offset for addressing index. Doesn't mean
>> to store immediate to memory.
>>
>> I don't think any load-store architecture has store immediate instruction.
>>
>
> Indeed. Sorry for the noise.
>
> Somehow Will caught a whiff of whatever I was smoking then :)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists