[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5652DF72.6060004@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:42:10 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: kernel-team@...com, davewatson@...com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] kcm: Kernel Connection Multiplexor module
On 11/20/2015 10:21 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
[...]
> +
> +/* Macro to invoke filter function. */
> +#define KCM_RUN_FILTER(prog, ctx) \
> + (*prog->bpf_func)(ctx, prog->insnsi)
Any reason to redefine this macro?
We already have the same one as:
#define BPF_PROG_RUN(filter, ctx) (*filter->bpf_func)(ctx, filter->insnsi)
[...]
> +static int kcm_attach_ioctl(struct socket *sock, struct kcm_attach *info)
> +{
> + struct socket *csock;
> + struct bpf_prog *prog;
> + int err;
> +
> + csock = sockfd_lookup(info->fd, &err);
> + if (!csock)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + prog = bpf_prog_get(info->bpf_fd);
> + if (IS_ERR(prog)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(prog);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER) {
> + bpf_prog_put(prog);
I'd move this and the below bpf_prog_put() under out_put label, too.
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + err = kcm_attach(sock, csock, prog);
> + if (err) {
> + bpf_prog_put(prog);
^^^
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Keep reference on file also */
> +
> + return 0;
> +out:
> + fput(csock->file);
> + return err;
> +}
[...]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists