[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALx6S37AVnVxbcW=N451qH1VKiNJ1HZYEj8eqob-4hXWcHbD3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:52:49 -0800
From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Singhai, Anjali" <anjali.singhai@...el.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Patil, Kiran" <kiran.patil@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: Generalize udp based tunnel offload
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015, at 18:32, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> As you said this in only feedback and nobody is forcing anyone to do
>> anything. But encouraging HW vendors to provide generic mechanisms so
>> that your users can use whatever protocol they want is the exact
>> _opposite_ of punishing users, this is very much a pro-user direction.
>
> Some users will suffer worse performance in case we don't correctly set
> ip_summed for a specific protocol before we do the copy operations from
> user space into skbs but if they are always done in the driver.
>
Please be specific. Who are the users, what is exact performance
regression, what are specific protocols in question?
> Bye,
> Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists