[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151124.133754.654421175431044735.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:37:54 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hannes@...essinduktion.org
Cc: tom@...bertland.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anjali.singhai@...el.com, jesse@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kiran.patil@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: Generalize udp based tunnel offload
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:43:35 +0100
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015, at 18:32, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> As you said this in only feedback and nobody is forcing anyone to do
>> anything. But encouraging HW vendors to provide generic mechanisms so
>> that your users can use whatever protocol they want is the exact
>> _opposite_ of punishing users, this is very much a pro-user direction.
>
> Some users will suffer worse performance in case we don't correctly set
> ip_summed for a specific protocol before we do the copy operations from
> user space into skbs but if they are always done in the driver.
Your concern presumes that looking backwards is as important as looking
forward.
We want to simplify things _and_ move away from protocol specific
csums, and if some old crufty hardware based systems pay some performance
cost for this I say so be it.
So this is not a valid argument against Tom's changes in my mind.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists