[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1448557786.24696.84.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:09:46 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: use-after-free in sock_wake_async
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 18:03 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> My rationale was like this: we already have rcu to free the wq, so we
> don't add any more callbacks as current code. sock_alloc is right now
> 1136 bytes, which is huge, like 18 cachelines. I wouldn't think it does
> matter a lot as we thrash anyway. tcp_sock is like 45 cachelines right
> now, hui.
Again, these speculations are really killing me.
Can you wait I send my patches ?
They work just great, and there is no risk of perf regression with added
RCU freeing of inodes :(
It is Thanks Giving in the US, vacation time.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists