[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151126192736.662634d3@free-electrons.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:27:36 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
linux@....linux.org.uk, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
andrew@...n.ch, jason@...edaemon.net,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, simon.guinot@...uanux.org,
nadavh@...vell.com, alior@...vell.com, xswang@...vell.com,
myair@...vell.com, nitroshift@...oo.com, jaz@...ihalf.com,
tn@...ihalf.com, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 2/6] net: mvneta: fix bit assignment in
MVNETA_RXQ_CONFIG_REG
Dear Marcin Wojtas,
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:08:09 +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> MVNETA_RXQ_HW_BUF_ALLOC bit which controls enabling hardware buffer
> allocation was mistakenly set as BIT(1). This commit fixes the assignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.8+
> Fixes: c5aff18204da ("net: mvneta: driver for Marvell Armada 370/XP network
> unit")
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
What is the user-visible impact of this bug? Indeed, the code is wrong,
but things were working fine until now.
So I am not questioning that this patch should be merged, but only
questioning whether the stable tag is appropriate.
Same questions for your patch 3/6.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists