[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPv3WKdnNFF47_EeB852ui_2mWDuoOAycoDwxVM5dkGPYAOMCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:31:51 +0100
From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Gregory Clément
<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@...uanux.org>, nadavh@...vell.com,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Evan Wang <xswang@...vell.com>,
Yair Mahalalel <myair@...vell.com>, nitroshift@...oo.com,
Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 1/6] net: mvneta: add configuration for MBUS
windows access protection
Hi Thomas,
2015-11-26 19:25 GMT+01:00 Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>:
> Marcin,
>
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:08:08 +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
>> This commit adds missing configuration of MBUS windows access protection
>> in mvneta_conf_mbus_windows function - a dedicated variable for that
>> purpose remained there unused since v3.8 initial mvneta support. Because
>> of that the register contents were inherited from the bootloader.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.8+
>> Fixes: c5aff18204da ("net: mvneta: driver for Marvell Armada 370/XP network
>> unit")
>
> Is this actually fixing a user visible problem? If not, then I am not
> sure it qualifies for stable.
Indeed, it's not fixing a visible thing, unless you resume from
suspend to ram. However, the original driver declares and updates
'win_protect ' variable, which have remained unused for past 3 years:)
If you think it's not worth cc'ing stable despite that, I will remove
the notification.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> index e84c7f2..c4327b9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
>> #define MVNETA_WIN_SIZE(w) (0x2204 + ((w) << 3))
>> #define MVNETA_WIN_REMAP(w) (0x2280 + ((w) << 2))
>> #define MVNETA_BASE_ADDR_ENABLE 0x2290
>> +#define MVNETA_ACCESS_PROTECT_ENABLE 0x2294
>
> Spaces are used for indentation in the definitions of all other
> constants in this driver, so I think you should stick with this
> convention, at least to remain consistent.
>
Ok.
>> #define MVNETA_PORT_CONFIG 0x2400
>> #define MVNETA_UNI_PROMISC_MODE BIT(0)
>> #define MVNETA_DEF_RXQ(q) ((q) << 1)
>> @@ -3188,9 +3189,11 @@ static void mvneta_conf_mbus_windows(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>>
>> win_enable &= ~(1 << i);
>> win_protect |= 3 << (2 * i);
>> +
>
> Unneeded change.
>
Indeed, my mistake.
Thanks,
Marcin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists