[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151128145003.GA4135@amd>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:50:03 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jcliburn@...il.com,
chris.snook@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
nic-devel@...lcomm.com, ronangeles@...il.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: 4.3+: Atheros ethernet fails after resume from s2ram, due to
order 4 allocation
Hi!
> > /*
> > * real ring DMA buffer
> > * each ring/block may need up to 8 bytes for alignment, hence the
> > * additional bytes tacked onto the end.
> > */
> > ring_header->size = size =
> > sizeof(struct atl1c_tpd_desc) * tpd_ring->count * 2 +
> > sizeof(struct atl1c_rx_free_desc) * rx_desc_count +
> > sizeof(struct atl1c_recv_ret_status) * rx_desc_count +
> > 8 * 4;
> >
> > ring_header->desc = pci_alloc_consistent(pdev, ring_header->size,
> > &ring_header->dma);
>
> Why is pci_alloc_consistent doing an unconditional GFP_ATOMIC
> allocation? atl1_setup_ring_resources already does GFP_KERNEL
> allocation in the same function so this should be sleepable
> context. I think we should either add pci_alloc_consistent_gfp if
> there are no explicit reasons to not do so or you can workaround
There's existing interface "dma_alloc_coherent" which can be used.
I did not yet try with __GFP_REPEAT, but GFP_KERNEL should already be
big improvement.
Let me send a patch..
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists