netdev - What now when we're [almost] out of ADVERTISED bits?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CO2PR11MB00887F0A656EFB801BA2599797010@CO2PR11MB0088.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 Nov 2015 13:53:51 +0000
From:	Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To:	"ben@...adent.org.uk" <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: What now when we're [almost] out of ADVERTISED bits?

[I suspect there was probably some discussion over this,
but I couldn't find it; References would be welcome]

So it appears we're almost out of bits for new advertised speeds;
I'm currently looking at adding 100g.

Assuming we want [and we do want] to have those in the `supported',
`advertising' and `lp_advertising' fields, the 2 reserve fields in
ethtool_cmd would not be sufficient [unless we break them into 4 u16].
Or are we planning something more generic than this for future bits?

Following with a slightly [but related] topic, what's our policy for
non-finalized standards? Specifically, for 25Gb and 50Gb?

Thanks,
Yuval

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html