[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87610ivv6u.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:13:29 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: Matt Bennett <Matt.Bennett@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Luuk Paulussen <Luuk.Paulussen@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: Increasing skb->mark size
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Matt Bennett
> <Matt.Bennett@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>> I'm emailing this list for feedback on the feasibility of increasing
>> skb->mark or adding a new field for marking. Perhaps this extension
>> could be done under a new CONFIG option.
>
> 64-bit marks (both skb->mark and sk->sk_mark) would be useful for
> hosts doing complex policy routing as well. Current Android releases
> use 20 of the 32 bits. If the mark were 64 bits, we could put the UID
> in it, and stop using ip rules to implement per-UID routing.
This would be be great. I've recently ran into some issues with
the overhead of the Android firewall setup.
So basically you need 4 extra bytes in sk_buff. How about:
- shrinking skb->priority to 2 byte
- skb_iff is either skb->dev->iff or 0. so it could be replaced with a
single bit flag for the 0 case.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists