[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151201.142749.1921315575696738796.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 14:27:49 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hannes@...essinduktion.org
Cc: max@...2324.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Stable interface index option
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 17:02:23 +0100
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 16:50, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
>> > I'm not sure I understand how this would work- are we going to
>> > pin down the ifindex for some subset of interfaces?
>>
>> I'm not sure what your idea is, but I guess we might mean the same
>> thing:
>>
>> What I have in mind is that the user can supply a list of (ifname ->
>> ifindex) entries via a sysfs/procfs interface and if such a list is
>> present, the kernel will search the list for every ifname which is
>> registered and check if there is an entry. If there is, the ifindex
>> for this entry is used. If there is no entry found for the given
>> ifname, the usual algorithm is used (therefore inherently providing
>> backward compatibility).
>
> Sorry to ask because I don't like this feature at all. There was a lot
> of work on stable interface names. Why do you need stable ifindexes,
> which were never meant to be stable for a longer amount of time?
Because all the remote SNMP tools work with interface indexes, not names.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists