[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151201.154529.788782225778447815.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:45:29 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
hannes@...essinduktion.org, edumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: fix sock_wake_async() rcu protection
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:03:11 -0800
> Dmitry provided a syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
> triggering a fault in sock_wake_async() when async IO is requested.
>
> Said program stressed af_unix sockets, but the issue is generic
> and should be addressed in core networking stack.
>
> The problem is that by the time sock_wake_async() is called,
> we should not access the @flags field of 'struct socket',
> as the inode containing this socket might be freed without
> further notice, and without RCU grace period.
>
> We already maintain an RCU protected structure, "struct socket_wq"
> so moving SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE & SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA into it
> is the safe route.
>
> It also reduces number of cache lines needing dirtying, so might
> provide a performance improvement anyway.
>
> In followup patches, we might move remaining flags (SOCK_NOSPACE,
> SOCK_PASSCRED, SOCK_PASSSEC) to save 8 bytes and let 'struct socket'
> being mostly read and let it being shared between cpus.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists