[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEh+42ivCoBE-vAwWpHHmHYqcXzKP+ceZSvg2rEPh7Db3M1k6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:25:40 -0800
From: Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: Generalize udp based tunnel offload
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 7:21 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:53:44 -0800
>
>> The bad effect of this model is that it is encourages HW vendors to
>> continue implement HW protocol specific support for encapsulations, we
>> get so much more benefit if they implement protocol generic
>> mechanisms.
>
> +1
Regardless of what happens in the future, I think the main question is
how this relates to the code that is currently present in the tree. We
already have NDOs for VXLAN offloading, which is about as protocol
specific as you can get. In my mind, this series is strictly an
improvement to what is already there - it pulls all hardware
offloading code out of the various protocol implementations and VXLAN
out of the driver interface. That seems like a pretty nice cleanup to
me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists